The Lililwan project: neurodevelopmental outcomes and fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in remote Australian aboriginal children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction and Aims: Aboriginal leaders in remote Western Australian communities, concerned about the impact of high levels of alcohol consumption in pregnancy, invited researchers to collaborate in The Lililwan Project with the objective to determine prevalence of FASD. Design and Methods: Using active ascertainment, children born in 2002/2003, living in the Fitzroy Valley in 2010/2011, were identified (n=134). In interviews, 127 (95%) consenting caregivers provided social, biomedical and antenatal data including alcohol use, with birth outcomes derived from medical records. Interdisciplinary assessments were conducted for 108 (81%) children. Prenatal alcohol exposure was objectively quantified. Conditions on the FASD spectrum (Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS), partial FAS, and Neurodevelopmental Disorder – Alcohol Exposed (ND-AE)) were diagnosed using Canadian FASD Diagnostic guidelines with slight modification. Management plans were prepared for each child. Results: Alcohol was used in 55% of 127 index pregnancies. Of women who drank, 87% drank at high-risk levels and 88% drank in the first trimester. In 108 children assessed, FAS or pFAS was diagnosed in 13 (120 per 1000 (95% CI 70-196), all with confirmed prenatal alcohol exposure. Of these, 69% had microcephaly, 85% had growth deficiency, and all had facial dysmorphology and CNS impairment in 3-8 domains. Using conservative diagnostic criteria, 8 more children were diagnosed with ND-AE. Overall FA SD prevalence was 194 per 1000 (95% CI 130-280). Additional children considered at high risk for neurodevelopmental difficulties were referred for future evaluation. Discussion and Conclusions: FASD prevalence was higher than reported previously in Australia and amongst the highest worldwide. Alcohol use in pregnancy remains a major public health challenge throughout Australia, particularly in r emote communities with high rates of alcohol consumption. Aboriginal community-led initiatives for FASD prevention and FASD intervention must be supported.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".