MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7048640793

Le programme de santé spécifique à un établissement 20 ans après sa mise en application

2002· other· fr· W7048640793 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge UdeS (Institutional Deposit of the University of Sherbrooke) · 2002
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)School dropoutPublic security
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The context in which the Occupational health and safety programme evolved from its inception up to now is very complex. On the one hand, the objective is the same for everyone: elimination at source of the dangers to the health, safety and physical wellbeing of workers as stipulated in article 2 of the Act Respecting Occupational health and Safety, in keeping with workplaces assuming responsibility for it. On the other hand, thereare many players, the fields of competency are not always very clear, and numerous interests are involved. An establishment 's specific health programme has not escaped these frictions. This programme, entrenched in article 113 of the Act Respecting Occupational Health and Safety, is, according to some authors, the cornerstone of prevention in occupational health and safety. The responsibility for developing and implementing the activities ensuing from article 113 has devolved to the Ministry of Health and Social Services. This mandate is carried out today mainly by the occupational health teams in Local community service centres (CLSC), with consulting support from the occupational health teams of the Public health branches of the Regional health and social services boards. This health programme has four components, namely environmental monitoring, medical monitoring, information and first aid. Activities have been assigned to each of these components. Some of these activities have had difficulties that originale from various sources, with the main ones being the lack of financial resources and the continual calling into concern. Of the Occupational Health and Safety board (CSST) about how this programme is implemented and carried out by the resources in the health network. This essay attempts to demonstrate the consequences of these difficulties on the application of article 113 of the Act Respecting Occupational Health and Safety in light of the initial objectives of the Politique québécoise de la santé et de la sécurité des travailleurs (Quebec policy on worker health and safety).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKnowledge UdeS (Institutional Deposit of the University of Sherbrooke)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→