MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7048823150

Mistreatment of migrant construction workers : Trajectory
\nfrom the past to the present and into the future

2024· other· en· W7048823150 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUnimas Institutional Repository (Universiti Malaysia Sarawak) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLondon South Bank UniversityEuropean CommissionUnited Nations Development ProgrammeSimon Fraser UniversityLondon School of Economics and Political Science
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)PovertyWork (physics)LegislationCircumstantial evidencePopulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Labour migration is as old as human history. Based on current and centuries old practices, labour abuse in the construction industry is perhaps as old as humankind.
\nWith demographic changes in developed nations and poverty which afflicts labour -rich countries, labour migration is expected to continue in the future. This chapter posits
\nthat mistreatment of construction migrants in the future is likely to persist. Urban growth and physical infrastructure development of many nations owe in large part to the internal as well as international movement of construction workers, between developing and developed countries which is often the subject of interest, but also between developing countries and between developed countries. Such traverses give rise to labour abuse being global in nature. So dependent are labour-abundant developing countries on remittances by their citizens abroad that during the drafting of the General Agreement of Trade in Services (GATS), 1 they advocated for free movement of workers to be allowed as part of its provision, but their effort failed. In their final destinations, these migrants are often treated poorly by their construction employers: exploitative wages, insecure employment and forced labour, low safety
\nstandards and poor living conditions being the common features. Structural changes in the modern-day construction industry reinforced by discriminatory legislation and
\njudicial systems of host countries have further entrenched undesirable mistreatment of migrants. Central to this poor treatment is the perception of these workers as no more
\nthan disposable construction resources. Given these hurdles, this chapter ends by asking whether fair, safe and decent employment will ever be available worldwide for migrant construction workers. All relevant international organisations and nongovernment organisations (NGOs) should orchestrate their efforts for greater impact, as demonstrated by the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (usually given the short-hand title 'Global Compact') which was endorsed by the United
\nNations General Assembly on 19 December 2018.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUnimas Institutional Repository (Universiti Malaysia Sarawak)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207