MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7048885982

Natural and Anthropogenic Gadolinium in Natural Water Systems in the Columbus, OH and Rochester, NY Areas

2023· dissertation· en· W7048885982 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEffluentGadoliniumSurface waterGroundwaterWatershedWater pollutionWater qualityHydrology (agriculture)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gadolinium (Gd) chelates used to enhance contrast in Magnetic Resonant Imaging (MRI) are the most common source of anthropogenic Gd in water systems and humans. Most of the ~1 g of Gd injected is excreted in urine and likely enters water systems through wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Anthropogenic Gd concentrations in water samples from the Scioto Valley Watershed in the Columbus, OH area ranged from 8 parts per trillion (ppt (ng/L)) upstream of WWTPs to 78 ppt directly downstream of WWTPs consistent with anthropogenic Gd being added to the rivers from WWTPs. Although most of the Gd injected for a contrast enhanced MRI is excreted in urine, a small fraction of the Gd can be retained in the body for years. Furthermore, there is some evidence that a small percentage of humans that have no medical history of a Gd chelate-enhanced contrast MRI have slightly elevated Gd in body tissues (e.g. placentas, bones). A possible source this anthropogenic Gd could be anthropogenic Gd in drinking water. Municipal drinking water for the Rochester, NY, area comes from Hemlock Lake, Lake Ontario, or a mixture of the two. WWTP effluent flows into Lake Ontario but not into Hemlock Lake. Municipal drinking water samples from locations served by the different sources were collected. Anthropogenic Gd concentrations in the drinking water ranged from 0.5 to 2.7 ppt. Water samples were also collected from Hemlock Lake (2 locations) and from Lake Ontario (4 locations). The natural concentrations of rare earth elements (REEs) in these samples were much larger (5.2 to 17 ppt) than the natural concentrations of REEs in the drinking water samples (0.9 to 3.5 ppt) or the river system samples from the Columbus, OH area (4 to 14 ppt).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score0.812

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)Same topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207