MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7049338061

NURSING CAREER STRESS PREVENTION BY BACCALAUREATE NURSING EDUCATION: FACULTY VIEWS

2008· article· en· W7049338061 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSuperconducting Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkforceStressorNurse educationEconomic shortageModalitiesWork (physics)Nursing shortageBaccalaureate Degree
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nursing career stress (NCS) will continue to gain prominence as impacts of the nursing shortage worsen. Measures targeting NCS are well researched, although predominately focus on the existing workforce and/or workplaces. Little exploration has occurred about preventing nurses’ stress prior to workforce entry. Baccalaureate nursing education (NE) has unparalleled access to, and influence with, nursing students (NS). It is thus proposed that explicitly preparing NSs for realities of nursing practice and work life can prevent exposures to NCS, ameliorate responses to it, and prevent its negative outcomes. Stress prevention/management has previously been incorporated into baccalaureate curricula; however, in all cases except one, NSs, stress was the sole focus. The potential role ofNE in preventing its graduates’ future NCS has yet to be explored. This descriptive study was part of a larger study about NCS prevention (NCSP). The specific purpose of this study was to begin exploring NE’s potential participation in NCSP, by garnering views of baccalaureate nursing faculty about NCS, and NE’s past, present, and potential roles, opportunities, barriers, and responsibilities in NCSP. The study was theoretically framed on a researcher-developed model that demarcated potential modalities for NE-driven NCSP. Using a researcher-developed instrument, 215 faculty teaching in baccalaureate nursing programs in Ontario were surveyed. Nursing education was not perceived by faculty as significantly impacting NCS; however, NE was perceived to share responsibility for, and be capable of doing so; therefore, can and should explicitly expand its role in NCSP, focusing on that specific to stressors and responses to them. Several barriers to NE’s role expansion were noted, including: a lack of understanding of NE’s current role and what an expanded role could be; a knowledge deficit among nurse educators about the subject; a lack of room in current curricula; a shortage of faculty; and faculty’s heavy workloads and time constraints. Current curricula, especially the clinical portions, were seen as ineffectively impacting graduates’ NCS and/or negatively contributing to it, and warranting critical assessment and radical revision. There are no simple solutions for NCS or the nursing shortage. However, this research gives impetus for further study of NE’s potential involvement in NCSP, and provides initial direction for NE to expand its involvement in NCSP through explicitly incorporating NCS and NCSP content and processes into the baccalaureate curriculum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship@Western (Western University)→Same topicSuperconducting Materials and Applications→French-language works237,207→