The Ontario boundaries; a conspiracy to despell the province of half its territory.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In response to the Colonial Secretary's invitation, the Government sent Hon.Chief Justice Draper as a special agent to represent Canadian interests before the House of Commons Committee.He was examined before the Committee, and gave evidence against the claims of the Company.Afterwards Justice Draper reported to the Canadian Government, and gave as his opinion that Canada had a clear right r under the Act of 1774 and the proclamation of 1791, to the whole country as far west as the line of the Mississippi, and to a considerable distance north of the water-shed ; and he recommended that the opinion of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council should be obtained upon the merits of the dispute. AN ABORTIVE MOVE.In August, 1858, a joint address of both Houses was forwarded to the Queen, in which it was stated that, in the opinion of Parliament, Canada had a right to claim, as forming part of her territory, a consider- able portion of the country then held by the Hudson's Bay Company, and that a settlement of the boundary line was immediately required.The law officers of the Crown were consulted on the subject by the Colonial Secretary during the previous year, and they expressed the opinion that, while a decision of [the Judicial Committee of the Privy the course towards another which the Government of Canada has ONTARIO AND THI DISPUTED TERRITORY Ontario tinder the award 107,000 square miles, without the disputed territory 100,000 square miles, Manitoba as enlarged by pari of the disputed terrilory 150,000 squaro miles, Manitoba without any of the disputed territory --115,000 square miles, ( i" ebec • 210.000 squa.Repudiation of the award deprives Ontario of the re- gion north of the height of land, which goes .ono other Province 02,000 square miles, And adds to Manitoba 35, oo square miles Amount of lumber in district added to Manitoba Value of this lumber to Ontario Loss per head to the people of Ontario from timber alone otal loss to each ratepayer uot less than An annual tax forever on each taxpayer of COMPARATIVE SIZES OF THE LARGER PROVINCES
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".