MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7051687255

Primary Health Care (PHC) Registered Nurses (RNs) as facilitators of healthcare access for recent immigrants in Ontario: An interpretive descriptive study

2024· dissertation· en· W7051687255 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsHealth careImmigrationPopulationQualitative researchDescriptive researchConfidentialityGovernment (linguistics)Scope (computer science)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Objectives: Recent immigrants experience unique challenges when accessing health services. Registered Nurses (RNs) working in primary health care (PHC) have the competencies and are well-positioned to facilitate healthcare access for immigrants. Aim: This study explored how PHC-RNs in Ontario support healthcare access and address barriers among recent immigrants. Methods: This study used a qualitative, interpretive descriptive approach and was informed by Levesque et al.’s (2013) access to care framework. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 PHC RNs practising in Toronto, Ottawa-Gatineau, Hamilton, Kitchener-Cambridge-Waterloo, and London. Data were collected and analyzed concurrently using an inductive and deductive approach. Results: Findings show that PHC-RNs play instrumental roles in supporting recent immigrants through facilitating healthcare access across 9 dimensions of Levesque et al.’s (2013) access framework: (1) appropriateness, (2) availability and accommodation, (3) ability to perceive, (4) ability to engage, (5) ability to seek, (6) ability to reach, (7) affordability, (8) ability to pay, and (9) acceptability. RNs addressed significant challenges to health service access for recent immigrants, including language, geographical, and financial barriers. Several opportunities were identified to enhance the PHC RN clinical practice role to improve the delivery of PHC for recent immigrants, such as increasing organizational resources, utilizing their expertise and role beyond the PHC clinic, and promoting culturally appropriate care. Conclusions: PHC-RNs are key facilitators of healthcare access for recent immigrants by coordinating their care, educating, and connecting this population to services across the health system. However, there are opportunities to optimize nursing roles and more effectively utilize their scope of practice within interdisciplinary teams to promote the health of immigrants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→