Peripheral O2 chemoreceptors mediate humoral catecholamine secretion from fish chromaffin cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study addressed the hypothesis that the secretion of catecholamines from trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) chromaffin cells, during hypoxia, is triggered by stimulation of O2 chemoreceptors located within the gills. Sodium cyanide was administered into the inspired water (external cyanide) or injected into the gill circulation (internal cyanide) to pharmacologically stimulate external (water sensing) or internal (blood sensing) O2 chemoreceptors, respectively. Both of these treatments caused an elevation of circulating catecholamine levels. The response to external, but not internal, cyanide was abolished by removal of the first gill arch. Hypoxia produced an increase in circulating catecholamine levels that was unaffected by removal of the first gill arch or by denervation of the pseudobranch. Cyanide and hypoxia both caused the well-documented cardiorespiratory reflexes normally observed in this species. This study demonstrates, for the first time, that gill O2 chemoreceptors can initiate the reflex that leads to catecholamine release from the chromaffin cells and that stimulation of internally oriented O2 receptors on all gill arches appears to be the physiologically important mechanism for initiating release.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".