MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7051819666

Percepção da gestante sobre sua família e gestação por meio do modelo Calgary e da Hermenêutica

2018· article· en· W7051819666 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBDTD (Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess (computing)Work (physics)Vulnerability (computing)Service (business)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The gestational period involves changes in different aspects, showing that antenatal care must exceed the biological dimension. Objective: To understand the perception of the pregnant woman about her family and pregnancy through the Calgary model and Hermeneutics. Method: It is a descriptive, exploratory, qualitative study, carried out with pregnant women and their families in a Basic Health Unit, in the city of Santa Cruz / RN, whose sample was defined by the method of data saturation. Three thematic workshops were carried out, applying the techniques of the genogram and ecomap, group dynamics to understand the interpersonal relationships between pregnant women and their families. The semi-structured interviews underwent an analysis using Habermas's dialectical-hermeneutics, with a synthesis of the critical and understanding processes. Results: The categories "My family", "Positive feelings" and "Negative feelings" emerged. The graphic representations (genogram) of each family were constructed, as well as identifying the support and / or conflict (ecomapa) relationships. Discussion: There are family relationships of support and conflict. The genogram allowed to visualize the compositions of the families and the ecomapa allowed to analyze the diverse relations contained in the supra-systems and systems, through the feedebacks, of the process of self-regulation. The statements of the pregnant women were analyzed through the concepts of the Calgary Model of Family Assessment and hermeneutic-dialectic. It was noticed that the pregnant women belonged same family nucleus, but live the world of living different systems and subsystems. The process of communication, faced with the topics covered, was permeated by disturbed languages, however, being possible to understand and discuss them. Final considerations: Family support improved the gait of pregnancy emotionally. Those who did not receive it immediately experienced the balance of relationships with the passing of days. In this way, pregnant women could feel more confident, certainly in this process, dialogue was fundamental to success. Studies are still needed that point out ways to address the conflicts and challenges that arise from pregnancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBDTD (Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte)Same topicNuclear reactor physics and engineeringFrench-language works237,207