MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7051923917

Remembering the forgotten shore : sustainable development alternatives for Owls Head, Nova Scotia

2022· dissertation· en· W7051923917 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSkemman · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrostatic Discharge in Electronics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismIncentiveSustainable developmentCommunity developmentLocal communitySustainable tourismSustainable communityQuality (philosophy)SubsidyCultural heritageSustainability
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rural coastal communities are increasingly challenged to innovate and adapt to changes brought on by external economic, environmental, and sociocultural pressures. As a means of adapting to these changes, this study explored sustainable tourism and innovative community-based development strategies within the contexts of conservation and community 
\nengagement by focusing on the case of Owls Head, Nova Scotia. Supported by background knowledge from an extensive literature review, 13 semi-structured interviews were conducted. Community assets were evaluated with regards to their potential to contribute to sustainable tourism development in the Owl’s Head region. Analysis resulted in five core 
\nthemes: (1) Recognizing the Importance of Owls Head to NS, (2) Owls Head & Ecosystem Regeneration, (3) Building Trust through Community Engagement, (4) Building Community Resilience through Tourism, and (5) Localized Economic Development. Based on the results, many stakeholders believe that the accessibility and quality of tourist sites surrounding Owls Head can be improved and protected by creating and updating infrastructure. Additionally, interviewees believed programming initiatives are needed to add value to tourist experiences 
\nand infrastructure. Policy recommendations to stimulate regenerative development could include renewable energy subsidies, incentives for local business development, designation of protected areas, and/or subsidies and grant funding for local organizations and initiatives. The 
\nmain lessons learned from this study are that development should: restore trust between community members and outsiders, highly value and utilize local ideas and resources, improve access to and quality of the natural environment, showcase the cultural heritage of the region, and inspire further innovation. Further research is needed to understand the full impacts, effectiveness, and complexities of community-based, community-led infrastructure and program development on Nova Scotia’s Eastern Shore.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.713
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it