The prevalence and predictors of tuberculin positivity in subjects screened for reasons other than contact investigation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: No previous studies have estimated the rates of tuberculin positivity (TP) in noncontact populations within the same community, which is important for prioritizing and implementing preventive measures. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence and predictors of TP in noncontact populations. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of tuberculin results of non-contact populations screened in British Columbia from 1990 to 2002 was conducted. RESULTS: The period prevalence of TP in 59,791 screened subjects was 12.7% (95% CI 12.4% to 13.0%), 30.4% (95% CI 28.2% to 32.7%) and 60.9% (95% CI 60.3% to 61.6%) for Canadian-born non-Aboriginals (CBNAs), Canadian-born Aboriginals (CBAs) and foreign born (FB), respectively. After controlling for age and sex, independent predictors of TP included Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination (OR 19.6, 95% CI 17.9 to 21.5), country of birth (CBA: OR 2.87, 95% CI 2.44 to 3.37; FB: OR 3.67, 95% CI 3.34 to 4.03) and the following populations: correctional centre residents (OR 4.14, 95% CI 1.87 to 9.15), residents of long-term care and community care facilities (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.23), immigrants (OR 1.75, 95 % CI 1.50 to 2.04), health centre employees (OR 1.71, 95 % CI 1.56 to 1.88), volunteers (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.68), self-referred healthy subjects (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.48) and students (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.35). CBAs, FB and male subjects were less likely to react to tuberculin than CBNAs and female subjects among those vaccinated with Bacille Calmette-Guérin (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of TP correlate with disease rates by sex and origin. The continuation of tuberculin screening programs is warranted in noncontact populations with high TP rates, where unknown exposure to active cases is more likely to occur. Further research is needed to determine the reasons why a higher response to tuberculin occurs in BCG-vaccinated women and CBNAs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".