MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7052065260

Prevalence and Associations of Work Stress and Llfe Stress with Depressive Symptoms among Female Hospital Day Workers and Shift Workers

2022· dissertation· en· W7052065260 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepressive symptomsDepression (economics)Shift workOccupational stressLogistic regressionJob stressEpidemiologyPopulationJob strainCross-sectional studyOccupational safety and health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Women working in healthcare experience higher levels of work stress compared to the general population. Life stress may also be higher among this population due to how the nature of the job affects workers’ personal lives. Depressive symptoms and depression are also generally higher among female healthcare workers compared to the general population. 
\nObjectives: To determine the prevalence of work stress, life stress, and depressive symptoms among female hospital employees and their associations among shift workers and day workers.
\nMethods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Kingston Health Sciences Centre in Southeastern Ontario between 2011 and 2014 with 168 rotating shift workers and 160 day workers. Levels of work stress were measured using the Job Content Questionnaire and the Siegrist Effort-Reward ratio, life stress was measured using the Derogatis Stress Profile, and depressive symptoms were measured with the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale. Logistic regression examined associations separately for day and shift workers. 
\nResults: Compared to day workers, shift workers experienced higher levels of psychological job demands (p<0.01), physical exertion (p<0.01), and effort spent (p<0.01) on average, and lower levels of overall support at work (p<0.01). Day workers experienced higher job insecurity (p<0.01), over-commitment (p=0.01) and life stress (p=0.03). The prevalence of moderate to severe depressive symptoms was 27% among day workers and 19% among shift workers. Perceived support resulted in reduced prevalence of depressive symptoms (OR 0.74, 95%CI 0.64 to 0.85) among day workers, whereas perceived job insecurity was associated with higher risk of depressive symptoms (OR 1.39, 95%CI 1.06 to 1.83). Over-commitment was associated with higher prevalence of depressive symptoms (day: OR 1.12, 95%CI 1.00 to 1.26; shift: OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.38), whereas higher esteem was associated with lower prevalence of depressive symptoms (day: OR 0.85, 95%CI 0.77 to 0.94; shift: OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.77 to 0.98).
\nConclusions: Prevalence of depressive symptoms was like that seen in previous studies of female healthcare professionals. Although work status did not meet the statistical criteria as an effect modifier in the association between stress measures and moderate to severe depressive symptoms, some differences were apparent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it