MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7052174694

Rapid and sensitive detection of viable mycobacteria in bovine faeces and blood by a novel phagomagnetic separation (PhMS)-qPCR assay

2024· article· en· W7052174694 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Portal (Queen's University Belfast) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrostatic Discharge in Electronics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersQueen's UniversityQueen's University Belfast
KeywordsParatuberculosisFecesBovine tuberculosisMycobacterium bovisTuberculosisCattle Diseases
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<i>Mycobacterium avium</i> subsp.<i> paratuberculosis </i>(MAP) and <i>Mycobacterium bovis</i> are slow-growing mycobacterial pathogens that cause Johne’s disease (Paratuberculosis) and Bovine Tuberculosis, respectively. The potential of a new Phagomagnetic separation (PhMS)-qPCR assay to detect viable MAP and/or M. bovis in bovine faeces and blood within 24 h was investigated. Following careful optimization of sample preparation protocols, faeces samples (n=376) from calves and adult cattle on several Johne’s affected farms, and blood samples (n=174) from TB skin test reactor and routine slaughter &lt;30 month old cattle collected at point of slaughter, were tested by PhMS-qPCR and culture. Results of faecal testing demonstrate that the novel PhMS-qPCR assay can quickly detect calves or cattle shedding viable MAP, i.e. infectious animals. Results of blood testing revealed that viable MAP and/or <i>M. bovis</i> mycobacteraemias were readily detectable in cattle at slaughter in Northern Ireland, with co-infections (both MAP and M. bovis detected in same blood sample) frequently encountered. Collectively, results indicate that the novel PhMS-qPCR assays may represent new diagnostic tests for Johne’s disease and bovine Tuberculosis in the future. <br/>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.777

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Portal (Queen's University Belfast)Same topicElectrostatic Discharge in ElectronicsFrench-language works237,207