Progetto europeo ‘EU/Canada Cooperation Programme in Higher Education’- CEMMENTI: “Canada Exchanges with the Mediterranean: Migration Experiences and their Impact on Nationalism, Trans-nationalism, and Identity”, 2005/2008.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of the proposed project is to create a joint curriculum between the partner institutions that focuses on the study of nationalism, transnationalism and migration. The project includes the exchange of teaching staff as well as a total number of 54 students equally divided between Canadian and European partner institutions who will study abroad. The project is conceived according to an interdisciplinary methodology, aiming to bring together scholars and students from the social sciences and the humanities (literature, arts, history, cultural studies, ethnomusicology, anthropology, European and Mediterranean studies). The project aims to create a common transfer system between partner institutions and will produce and deliver a new interdisciplinary course, worth 10 ECTS, on the study of nationalism, transnationalism and migration composed of modules developed by the members of the project team. The course modules will also be made available through a website and/or CD ROM which contains the syllabuses and resources for teaching courses specified within the project. \nThe start date of the project is 1 November 2005; activities will end on 31 October 2008 \nThe European consortium institutions are: University of Bologna (European Coordinator); University of Athens; University of Malta. The Canadian consortium institutions: University of Prince Edward Island; York University Toronto; Trent University. \nPartner Institutions envisage two meetings of the teaching staff per year, (one on the occasion of the annual EU/Canada/US consortia conference and the other in one of the partner institutions. First year: University of Prince Edward Island; second year: University of Malta; third year: University of Bologna). In the second year and in the third year, partner institutions will encourage and support students mobility: students will be offered the opportunity to study abroad for a term, and encouraged to join virtual class for an additional month.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".