PROBLEME PRIVIND DEZVOLTAREA SISTEMULUI DE COMUNICARE ŞTIINŢIFICĂ DIN REPUBLICA MOLDOVA ŞI ACCESUL DESCHIS LA INFORMAŢIE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prezentul studiu are ca subiect de abordare sistemul de comunicare ştiinţifică în Republica Moldova. Este prezentată metodologia şi rezultatele unui studiu explorator, realizat în 23 de universităţi, instituţii ştiinţifice şi academice. Studiul însumează rezultatele cercetării sociologice efectuate în perioada decembrie 2010 - iulie 2012, cu privire la: atitudini şi opinii ale cadrelor universitare şi ale cercetătorilor privind sistemul de comunicare ştiinţifică în Republica Moldova, frecvenţa comunicării între diferiţi parteneri sociali în domeniul ştiinţei, utilizarea diferitelor mijloace de comunicare ştiinţifică, avantajele şi dezavantajele revistelor ştiinţifice, rolul revistelor şi al arhivelor cu acces deschis în calitate de mijloace noi de comunicare ştiinţifice etc. Cuvinte-cheie: comunicare ştiinţifică, acces deschis, mijloace de comunicare ştiinţifică, reviste cu acces deschis, arhive instituţionale cu acces deschis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".