Review of "Deep Waters: Courage, Character, and the Lake Timiskaming Canoeing Tragedy"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep Waters: Courage, Character, and the Lake Timiskaming Canoeing Tragedy by James Raffan isn't easy to read.It chronicles a Canadian wilderness disaster offering preventative lessons, for those willing to learn.On Sunday June 11, 1978, twenty-seven boys, aged eleven to thirteen, and four leaders, started from Timiskaming, Quebec heading north for James Bay.It was to be a tough three weeks intended to transform boys into men.They paddled four brand-new, twenty-two foot canoes.A gentle tailwind helped in the morning, but by dark, all four canoes were swamped.Twelve boys and one leader were dead from hypothermia.The following day, the survivors were rescued.A coroner's inquest ruled the deaths accidental.Raffan is the right person to re-examine this event.He spent his boyhood summers at camps in northern Ontario, learning to swim, canoe, camp and eventually to lead trips in the Canadian wilderness.He knows the theory and practice of education.He has both a Bachelor of Science and a Bachelor of Education.He taught high school, and then he completed a PhD.He instructed at the Queen's University Faculty of Education Outdoor Education Program for eighteen years.Now, he writes about what he learned and what he taught while taking young people on wilderness trips.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".