Role of the community pharmacist in detecting frailty and spatio-temporal disorientation among community-dwelling older people in France
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Many older community-dwelling subjects may be frail and/or disoriented, putting them at risk of adverse outcomes. We investigated the prevalence of frailty and spatiotemporal disorientation among patients aged > 65 years collecting regular medication at a community pharmacy. Methods Prospective, cross-sectional study of geriatric evaluation in 218 community pharmacies in France. Regular customers aged > 65 years attending the pharmacy to receive ≥ 1 prescription drug were eligible. Spatio-temporal disorientation was assessed using a 4-item screening test; subjects were considered disoriented if they had ≥ 1 incorrect answers. Frailty was evaluated using the Short Emergency Geriatric Assessment (SEGA) grid. Subjects were considered as not frail (score < 8), or frail/very frail (score of 8 or more). Results 4090 subjects were included, average age 77.5 ± 7.6 years, 60.1% females. Overall, 1025 (25%) were frail/very frail, and 384 (9.4%) were disoriented in space or time. On average, subjects were taking 5.4 ± 3.5 medications per day. Among non-frail patients, 116/3065 (3.8%) were disoriented, of whom 87 (87/116, 75%) managed their medication alone. Among frail/very frail patients, 268/1025 (26.1%) were disoriented, of whom 46 (46/268, 16.8%) managed their medication alone. The majority of patients (77.9%) collected their medication alone at the pharmacy, but significantly fewer frail patients came to collect their drugs alone (p < 0.001). Conclusion It is feasible for community pharmacists to detect disorientation and frailty among older patients. A quarter of subjects were frail/very frail, and 3.2% were disoriented yet managing their drugs alone. Additional social support should be envisaged for these subjects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it