MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7052514257

Search for D<sup>0</sup>-DÌ<sup>0</sup>mixing using semileptonic decay modes

2004· article· en· W7052514257 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma Diagnostics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesInstitute of High Energy PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungAlfred P. Sloan FoundationDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSemileptonic decayDetectorMixing (physics)Charm (quantum number)Limit (mathematics)Set (abstract data type)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on an 87-fb-1data set collected by the BABAR detector at the PEP-II asymmetric-energy B Factory, a search for D0- D̄0mixing has been made using the semileptonic decay modes D*+→ π+D0, D0→ K(*)eν (+c.c.). The use of these modes allows unambiguous flavor tagging and a combined fit of the D0decay time and D*+-D0mass difference (ΔM) distributions. The high-statistics sample of unmixed semileptonic D0decays is used to model the ΔM distribution and time dependence of mixed events directly from the data Neural networks are used to select events and reconstruct the D0. A result consistent with no charm mixing has been obtained, Rmix= 0.0023 ± 0.0012 ± 0.0004. This corresponds to an upper limit of Rmix< 0.0042 (90% C.L.).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.468
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicPlasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207