Sharley Kurtz most recent employee to receive STAR Award
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Within the last year, three staff members of the College of Nursing & Professional Disciplines have been recognized for their contributions to the college and UND by the Council of State Employees (COSE). Each quarter, COSE accepts nominations and selects winners for the Service, Teamwork, Achievement, and Respect (STAR) award. During the first quarter of 2013, Susie Kroetsch, Accountant for the CNPD, received the award. In the fourth quarter of 2013, Peter Tunseth, Director of the Children & Family Training Service Center, was selected as an honoree. For the first quarter of 2014, Charley Kurtz, Instructional Designer for the CNPD, was named as a recipient. Susie, Pete, and Shar are three of the best representatives our college could ask for. Their commitment to UND, our community, and their professions make them exemplary models for our fellow faculty, staff, and students. Congratulations to all three of you, and thank you for your hard work and effort. The Dean's Office asks that you help us congratulate all three employees on Wednesday, April 30th at 2:00 pm. A small reception will be held in the break room of the Nursing Building, located on the third floor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.231 | 0.195 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".