Third and fourth annual reports of the committee of the Synod of the Presbyterian church of Canada, in connection with the Established church of Scotland, appointed to conduct the French Protestant mission in Canada East, July, 1845.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peterboro', Sarnia, and the United Congregations of Dundas and Ancaster, no contributions have been received for the years 1^43-4, from any of the congregations whose Ministers have separated themselves from the Synod.As the arrangements for that year, which have involved the Mission in considerable expense, have been gone into with their full concurrence and promised support, it is to be hoped they will feel morally bound to contribute to some extent to remove the present incumbrances, and the more especially as the object of the Mission is divested of those considerations which led to the late unhappy disruption of the Synod.Your Committee, however, express their fear that the burden of past obligations, as well as making pro- vision for the future, must rest entirely with the Synod ; a circumstance which, it is to be hoped, will stimulate every member to increased exertions, and to make up from the beneficence of their own congregations what may be lack- ing on the part of others.Your Committee, impressed with the importance of connecting with the preaching of the Word, the religious education of the young, directed early their attention to this subject.After some vexing delay, they succeded in obtaining the services of Mr. N., as stated in last Report. He arrived early in
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".