Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
VenueUniversity of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSoutheast Fisheries Science CenterNOAA Great Lakes Environmental Research LaboratoryPacific Northwest National LaboratoryLos Alamos National LaboratoryOak Ridge National LaboratoryArgonne National LaboratoryRocky Mountain Research StationFogarty International CenterNatural Environment Research CouncilBrookhaven National LaboratoryU.S. NavySmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryNational Ocean ServiceSmithsonian Environmental Research CenterUniversity of California, IrvineAgricultural Research ServiceUniversity of California, San DiegoUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillUniversity of California, DavisNational Park ServiceUniversity of California, Los AngelesCooperative State Research, Education, and Extension ServiceCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityU.S. Forest ServiceFederal Transit AdministrationFederal Aviation AdministrationNational Marine Fisheries ServiceJet Propulsion LaboratoryLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia UniversityNOAA ResearchAir Education and Training CommandRhode Island Sea Grant, University of Rhode IslandEarth Institute, Columbia UniversityUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignU.S. Geological SurveyOffice of Naval ResearchNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNational Institutes of HealthEuropean Centre for Medium-Range Weather ForecastsIndian Institute of Technology DelhiEuropean CommissionEnvironmental Defense FundStrongGeorgia Institute of TechnologyEcological Society of AmericaCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryMinistry of EnvironmentUniversity of Massachusetts BostonSouthwest Research InstituteNational Weather ServiceU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyUniversity of HartfordUniversity of OregonUniversity of DenverIowa State UniversitySouth Dakota School of Mines and TechnologyUniversity of ChicagoNorthern Arizona UniversityMichigan Technological UniversityElectric Power Research InstituteDivision of Environmental BiologyBureau of ReclamationMarshall Space Flight CenterUtah State UniversityAustralian GovernmentCommonwealth of MassachusettsPennsylvania State UniversitySouthern CompanyNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric ResearchJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthFreie Universität BerlinUniversity of RochesterNOAA Pacific Marine Environmental LaboratoryUniversity of MontanaNorth Carolina State UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityBradley UniversityNational Council for Air and Stream ImprovementNational Taiwan UniversityU.S. Department of the InteriorUniversity of OklahomaNational Sun Yat-sen UniversityU.S. Department of AgricultureMichigan State UniversityNational Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information ServiceUniversity of WashingtonFlorida International UniversityWashington State UniversityWorld Bank GroupArizona State UniversityMississippi State UniversityUniversity of MinnesotaEuropean Space AgencyHarvard UniversityNew Mexico State UniversityU.S. Department of StateSan Diego State UniversityU.S. Department of EnergyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyUniversity of ReadingCalifornia Environmental Protection AgencyOhio State UniversityGeorge Washington UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaEast Carolina UniversityBattelleUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyMcKnight FoundationU.S. Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentGoddard Space Flight CenterPrinceton UniversityBoeingCanadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric SciencesNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyOregon State UniversityNational Science FoundationUniversity of MiamiColorado State UniversityFlorida State UniversitySmithsonian InstitutionLangley Research CenterWoods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionSun Yat-sen UniversityCarnegie Institution of WashingtonNorthrop GrummanUnited States Agency for International DevelopmentResources for the FutureUniversity of MichiganDepartment of Water ResourcesUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore CountyCalifornia Air Resources BoardWorld Wildlife FundLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraOffice of Research and DevelopmentUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonYale UniversityU.S. Department of CommerceExxon Mobil CorporationCalifornia Energy CommissionNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationUniversity of East AngliaU.S. Department of TransportationU.S. Department of JusticeYork UniversityOffice of ScienceNature ConservancyGeorge Mason UniversityNew York State Department of Environmental ConservationU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesU.S. Army Corps of EngineersFord Motor CompanyHaverford College
KeywordsPlan (archaeology)Strategic planningClimate changeResearch programGlobal changeGlobal warmingSection (typography)
DOInot available
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexThis strategic plan has been prepared by the 13 federal agencies participating in the CCSP, with coordination by the CCSP staff under the leadership of Dr. Richard H. Moss. This strategic plan responds to the President's direction that climate change research activities be accelerated to provide the best possible scientific information to support public discussion and decision-making on climate-related issues.The plan also responds to Section 104 of the Global Change Research Act of 1990, which mandates the development and periodic updating of a long-term national global change research plan coordinated through the National Science and Technology Council.This is the first comprehensive update of a strategic plan for U.S. global change and climate change research since the original plan for the U.S. Global Change Research Program was adopted at the inception of the program in 1989.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.934
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
