← Back to cohort
Strategic Plan for the U.S. Climate Change Science Program
Bibliographic record
VenueUniversity of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSoutheast Fisheries Science CenterNOAA Great Lakes Environmental Research LaboratoryPacific Northwest National LaboratoryLos Alamos National LaboratoryOak Ridge National LaboratoryArgonne National LaboratoryRocky Mountain Research StationFogarty International CenterNatural Environment Research CouncilBrookhaven National LaboratoryU.S. NavySmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryNational Ocean ServiceSmithsonian Environmental Research CenterUniversity of California, IrvineAgricultural Research ServiceUniversity of California, San DiegoUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillUniversity of California, DavisNational Park ServiceUniversity of California, Los AngelesCooperative State Research, Education, and Extension ServiceCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityU.S. Forest ServiceFederal Transit AdministrationFederal Aviation AdministrationNational Marine Fisheries ServiceJet Propulsion LaboratoryLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia UniversityNOAA ResearchAir Education and Training CommandRhode Island Sea Grant, University of Rhode IslandEarth Institute, Columbia UniversityUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignU.S. Geological SurveyOffice of Naval ResearchNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNational Institutes of HealthEuropean Centre for Medium-Range Weather ForecastsIndian Institute of Technology DelhiEuropean CommissionEnvironmental Defense FundStrongGeorgia Institute of TechnologyEcological Society of AmericaCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryMinistry of EnvironmentUniversity of Massachusetts BostonSouthwest Research InstituteNational Weather ServiceU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyUniversity of HartfordUniversity of OregonUniversity of DenverIowa State UniversitySouth Dakota School of Mines and TechnologyUniversity of ChicagoNorthern Arizona UniversityMichigan Technological UniversityElectric Power Research InstituteDivision of Environmental BiologyBureau of ReclamationMarshall Space Flight CenterUtah State UniversityAustralian GovernmentCommonwealth of MassachusettsPennsylvania State UniversitySouthern CompanyNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric ResearchJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthFreie Universität BerlinUniversity of RochesterNOAA Pacific Marine Environmental LaboratoryUniversity of MontanaNorth Carolina State UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityBradley UniversityNational Council for Air and Stream ImprovementNational Taiwan UniversityU.S. Department of the InteriorUniversity of OklahomaNational Sun Yat-sen UniversityU.S. Department of AgricultureMichigan State UniversityNational Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information ServiceUniversity of WashingtonFlorida International UniversityWashington State UniversityWorld Bank GroupArizona State UniversityMississippi State UniversityUniversity of MinnesotaEuropean Space AgencyHarvard UniversityNew Mexico State UniversityU.S. Department of StateSan Diego State UniversityU.S. Department of EnergyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyUniversity of ReadingCalifornia Environmental Protection AgencyOhio State UniversityGeorge Washington UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaEast Carolina UniversityBattelleUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyMcKnight FoundationU.S. Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentGoddard Space Flight CenterPrinceton UniversityBoeingCanadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric SciencesNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyOregon State UniversityNational Science FoundationUniversity of MiamiColorado State UniversityFlorida State UniversitySmithsonian InstitutionLangley Research CenterWoods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionSun Yat-sen UniversityCarnegie Institution of WashingtonNorthrop GrummanUnited States Agency for International DevelopmentResources for the FutureUniversity of MichiganDepartment of Water ResourcesUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore CountyCalifornia Air Resources BoardWorld Wildlife FundLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraOffice of Research and DevelopmentUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonYale UniversityU.S. Department of CommerceExxon Mobil CorporationCalifornia Energy CommissionNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationUniversity of East AngliaU.S. Department of TransportationU.S. Department of JusticeYork UniversityOffice of ScienceNature ConservancyGeorge Mason UniversityNew York State Department of Environmental ConservationU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesU.S. Army Corps of EngineersFord Motor CompanyHaverford College
KeywordsPlan (archaeology)Strategic planningClimate changeResearch programGlobal changeGlobal warmingSection (typography)
DOInot available
Abstract
OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.137
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.026 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".
Quick stats
Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes