Table ronde de Montréal, procès-verbaux / proceedings. Le patrimoine matériel et immatériel : deux conventions de l’UNESCO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Textes des conférenciers / Texts of the speakers ; Session 1 : Liens entre les conventions de l’UNESCO de 1972 et de 2003 sur le patrimoine matériel et immatériel ; Session 1 : Relationship between the 1972 and 2003 UNESCO Conventions on tangible and intangible heritage ; 4.1 The Intangible Dimensions of the 1972 World Heritage Convention / Sarah Titchen, Spécialiste de programme, Affaires culturelles, UNESCO (New York) / Program Specialist for Culture UNESCO (New York) ; 4.2 The Tangible Dimensions of the 2003 Intangible Cultural Heritage Convention / Rieks Smeets, Chef, Patrimoine culturel immatériel, UNESCO, Paris / Chief, Intangible Cultural Heritage, UNESCO, Paris ; 4.3 La mémoire des lieux : préserver le sens et les valeurs immatérielles des monuments et des sites, Rapport de la 14e assemblée générale de l’ICOMOS, Zimbabwe 2003 / Dinu Bumbaru, Secrétaire général, ICOMOS International, Montréal / Secretary-General, ICOMOS, Montréal ; 4.4 Report on International Conference in Nara, 2004, on « Safeguarding of Tangible and Intangible Cultural Heritage : Towards an Integrated Approach » / Toshiyuki Kono, Professor of Law, Kyushu University, Japan / Professeur de droit,Université Kyushu, Japon ; Session II : Les Listes du patrimoine : les définitions et l’identification des valeurs ; Session II : Heritage Lists: Definitions and Identification of Values ; 4.5 How the 1972 and 2003 Conventions define heritage : overlaps and differences / Herb Stovel, Professeur agrégé, Programme de conservation du patrimoine, École des études canadiennes, Université Carleton, Ottawa / Associate Professor, Heritage Conservation Program, School of Canadian Studies, Carleton University, Ottawa ; 4.6 L’inventaire du patrimoine culturel immatériel du Québec : un modèle à suivre? / Laurier Turgeon, Professeur et titulaire, Chaire de recherche du Canada en patrimoine ethnologique, Institut du patrimoine culturel, Université Laval, Québec / Professor and Chair, Canada Research Chair in History and Ethnology, Institut du patrimoine culturel, Université Laval ; 4.7 Evolution of World Heritage criteria to address intangible dimensions of World Heritage values / John Pinkerton, Coordonnateur des affaires internationales, Parcs Canada, Gatineau / International Coordinator, Parks Canada, Gatineau ; 4.8 Tangible and Intangible Heritage : an Integrated Approach / Britta Rudolff, Conseillère de la gestion du patrimoine et des affaires de l’UNESCO, Royaume de Bahrein / Counsellor for Heritage Management and UNESCO Affairs, Kingdom of Bahrain ; 4.9 Approaches to conserving cultural World Heritage Sites / Susan Buggey, Professeure associée, École d’architecture de paysage, Faculté de l’aménagement, Université de Montréal / Adjunct Professor, School of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Environmental Design, Université de Montréal ; 4.10 Approaches to conserving natural World Heritage Sites / Murray McComb, Directeur, Division Programmes coopératifs, Parcs Canada, Gatineau / Director, Parks Canada, Gatineau ; 4.11 La conservation des sites du patrimoine mondial au Mali / Magali Cochard et Kibamba Nimon, Étudiantes à la maîtrise, Institut d’urbanisme, Faculté de l’aménagement, Université de Montréal / MA students, Institut d’urbanisme, Université de Montréal ; 4.12 La conservation de Koutammakou, site du patrimoine mondial au Togo / Gaël Amoussou, Étudiant, M. Sc.A. (Aménagement) Option Conservation de l’environnement bâti, Université de Montréal / Student, M.Sc.A, Option Conservation de l’environnement bâti, Faculty of Environmental Design, Université de Montréal ; Session 4 : Lignes directrices pour l’intégration de l’architecture contemporaine aux paysages urbains historiques ; Session 4 : Guidelines for the Integration of Contemporary Architecture in Historic Urban Landscapes ; 4.13 A Differential Diagnosis : Defining the Boundaries of the two Conventions / Gordon Fulton, Directeur, Services historiques, Parcs Canada, Gatineau / Director, Historical Services, Parks Canada, Gatineau ; 4.14 Cultural Landscapes and Intangible Cultural Heritage / Christina Cameron fera la présentation de Mechtild Rössler, Centre du patrimoine mondial de l’UNESCO, Paris / Christina Cameron will present a paper by Mechtild Rössler, UNESCO World Heritage Centre, Paris ; 4.15 Implications for modifying the World Heritage Operational Guidelines / Christopher Young, Coordonnateur, Patrimoine mondial, English Heritage, Londres / World Heritage Coordinator, English Heritage, London ; 4.16 Inscription des sites de valeurs immatérielles sous les deux conventions : toujours,parfois, jamais / Listing Sites with Intangible Values under both Conventions : always,sometimes, never / Dinu Bumbaru / Gustavo Araoz, ICOMOS International, Montréal
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.382 | 0.087 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".