Syracuse University Report of Donors 2002-2003
Bibliographic record
Abstract
alumni and friends made 2002-03 a banner year for the University.Your gifts have enabled us to move ahead with our Academic Plan, and begin implementing some of the key building and renovation projects outlined in the Academic Space Plan.It was also a banner year for our men's basketball team, which brought home SU's first ever NCAA championship.Our student-athletes are expected to perform equally well in the classroom, and thanks to ongoing donations to the Department of Athletics' academic support program, our student-athletes consistently meet a 92 percent graduation rate.I'm proud to say they are champions both on and off the field.Another outstanding example of the impact donor gifts can have on our continuous pursuit of excellence is the $15 million gift from the S.l.Newhouse Foundation and the Newhouse family toward construction of a third building in the Newhouse School's communications complex.Newhouse III will increase classroom and office space and provide an array of new facilities needed to train our students to meet the challenges of the digital communications age.I would also like to express my gratitude to Martin J. Whitman '49 for his pledge to name the School of Management.With his long-term financial commitment--one of the University's largest gifts-the Martin J. Whitman School of Management will continue to improve its performance and reputation for years to come.We are able to achieve such high standards and aim for new heights because of you, our donors.Your gifts provide the support we need to continuously enhance the quality of our curricula, attract outstanding faculty, offer scholarship support and innovative student programs, and upgrade our facilities and equipment.It is gratifying to know so many of you care so deeply about SU.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.063 | 0.030 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".