Uygurca Altun Yaruk’a ait belgeler: (351-400)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bu çalışmada, tam adı Altun öñlüg yaruk yaltrıklıg kopta kötrülmiş nom iligi olan, Altun Yaruk adlı esere ait 50 belgenin transliterasyonu ve transkripsiyonu bulunmaktadır. Mahayana Budizm'ine ait bir sutra kitabı olan eserin aslı Sanskritçedir. 8. yüzyılda Çinceye çevrilen bu eser, 10. yüzyılda Şiñko Şeli Tutuñ tarafından Uygurcaya çevrilmiştir. Eserin bilinen en büyük nüshası Petersburg'ta muhafaza edilmektedir. Diğer nüshalar, Mainz koleksiyonundaki ve Berlin-Branderburg Bilimler Akademisindeki parçalardır.\n\n\tÇalışmada incelenen belgeler Berlin-Branderbur Bilimler Akademisi Turfan koleksiyonunda muhafaza edilmektedir.\n\n\tÇalışma; Giriş, Metin, Dizin, ve Tıpkıbasım olarak dört bölümden oluşmaktadır.\n\n\tÇalışmada, 50 belgenin transliterasyonu ve transkripsiyonu yapıldı. Belgelerin Radloff-Malov yayınındaki yerleri gösterildi. Bütün kelimelerin dizini çıkarıldı. Çalışmanın sonuna, incelenen 50 belgenin fotoğrafı eklendi.\n\n\nAnahtar kelimeler: Türk dili, Eski Türkçe, Uygurca, Suvarnaprabhasa, Altun Yaruk, Şıñko Seli Tutuñ, Budizm , Turfan.\n\tThis work that was prepared as post graduate studies consists of translation and transcript of the 50 documents which belong to the work called 'Altun Yaruk'of which full name is 'Altun Önlüg yaruk yaltrıklıg kopta kötrülmüş nom iligi'.\n\nThis book is a sutra that is originally Sansritch belongs to Mahayana Budhaism. This work which was translated into Chinese in the 8th century ; was adapted to Uygur language by Şinko Şeli Tutun in the 10th century.The greatest copy of this work is kept Petersburg. The other copies are in Mainz Collection and Berlin-Branderburg Science Academy.\n\n \tCopies which were examined in this work are kept in Berlin -Branderbur Science Acdemy Turfan Collection.\n\n \tThe Work consists of four parts called introduction, text, index and the original copies of 50 documents.\n\n \tIn this work translation and transcript of the 50 documents were made. Their places were stated in Radloff- Malov's book.Rachmann and Gabain numbers of some parts of the documents were given.Indexes of all words were given.The photographs of the 50 documents which were examined ; were added to the end of the Work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.222 | 0.086 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".