MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7053337311

Using technology to accurately capture functional outcomes in sarcoma patients

2013· other· en· W7053337311 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) · 2013
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUsabilityAndroid (operating system)SoftwareAuditJavaAgile software developmentData collection
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The project is in collaboration with the Nottingham University Hospital (NHS) and focuses on capturing information to inform the evaluation of the functional outcomes following sarcoma treatment. The Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) is the actual survey exist and already commonly used within the NHS for monitoring and evaluating the physical function of individuals and group of patients who undergoing limb preservation surgery for tumors of the extremities over time and measuring change in function due to different therapeutic interventions (1). \n• Problem: the existing process of paper-based TESS survey implementation in NHS failed to achieve their intended purpose of utilizes the functional outcomes data to capture the useful information for the further evaluation. \n \n• Objectives: solve the exposed problem of functional outcome data (following sarcoma treatment) gathering and capturing in NHS, using technology to improve the current operation mechanism and pattern for data collecting and processing. Finally, accomplish digital data capture, analysis and visualization. \n \n• Methodology: agile software management method is used to management the entire project. The human computer interactive (HCI) knowledge mainly support on requirement gathering, the design of high usability application and high quality evaluation questionnaire. For the implementation part, android based TESS questionnaire app is achieved by JAVA language, and Android SDK and Eclipse as the development environment. The PC based database driven host application programs by Visual Studio 2012 compiler for C#, and MySQL database to store and retrieve data. \n \n• Achievements: an Android based tablet TESS questionnaire application realized accurately digital functional outcome data gathering and transfer, and a Windows PC based system achieved the transferred results reviewing, analyzing and visualization. The entire system is qualified to replace the current process used in NHS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham)Same topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207