MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7053339897

UGA School of Law enrolls academically talented and diverse first-year class

2005· article· en· W7053339897 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePress Releases · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClass (philosophy)Test (biology)Reading (process)Quarter (Canadian coin)Legal educationPoint (geometry)Higher educationStandardized test
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tuesday, August 16, 2005 WRITER: Heidi Murphy, 706/542-5172, hmurphy@uga.edu CONTACT: Giles Kennedy, 706/542-7060, gkennedy@uga.edu UGA School of Law enrolls academically talented and diverse first-year class ATHENS, Ga. – Today, an academically gifted and diverse group of students will begin the three-year pursuit of a law degree at the University of Georgia School of Law. The Class of 2008, comprised of 210 students, boasts a median Law School Admissions Test score of 163, which ties the record high and reflects a score that places them in the top 10 percent of test takers nationwide. The median undergraduate grade point average for these first-year students is 3.55. Moreover, the top quarter of the class scored a 164 or higher on the LSAT and achieved a 3.80 or better undergraduate GPA. Nearly one-quarter (23.8%) of the entering class indicated that they are members of a minority group, making this class one of the most diverse in law school history. Of the 50 minority students enrolled in the Class of 2008, 33 are African Americans. “Each year, we strive to enroll a highly qualified first-year class,” Georgia Law Director of Admissions Giles W. Kennedy said. “This year, we reviewed nearly 2,600 applications, and the admissions committee spent a significant amount of time reading files and paying close attention to the strengths and accomplishments of each applicant. We are confident these newly enrolled students will excel in their studies and become future leaders in the legal profession regionally, nationally and internationally.” He added, “Georgia Law’s strong academic reputation, backed by some of the best legal scholars in the nation, combined with its affordable tuition make Georgia Law an excellent place to earn a law degree.” The entering class includes 109 males and 101 females. In keeping with the law school's commitment to provide the finest legal education to state residents, 77 percent of the first-year students claim Georgia as their home state. The average age of the students is 24. The Class of 2008 includes graduates from 78 institutions who hail from 21 states. The schools supplying the largest number of students include the University of Georgia (71), the Georgia Institute of Technology (12), Emory University (7) and Georgia State University (6). Auburn, Furman, Spelman, Vanderbilt, Wake Forest and the universities of Florida and Tennessee are represented by four graduates each. Georgia Law is currently ranked as one of the top four public law schools in the Southeast and as one of the top 14 public law schools in the nation by U.S.News & World Report. ##

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.239
Threshold uncertainty score0.800

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0030.009
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2390.152

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePress ReleasesSame topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207