← Back to cohort
University of Montana Commencement Program, 2009
Bibliographic record
VenueThe Mathematics Enthusiast · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEurostarsAir Force Institute of TechnologyU.S. Air Force AcademyU.S. Naval AcademyCollege of Ocean Science and Resource, National Taiwan Ocean UniversityCalifornia State University, ChicoUniversity of California, Los AngelesUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraU.S. ArmyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignDirectorate for Biological SciencesUniversité de ParisShanghai International Studies UniversityBirla Institute of Technology and Science, PilaniEast China Normal UniversityUniversity of TorontoFudan UniversityConcordia UniversitySogang UniversityChungbuk National UniversityUniversity of AlbertaOhio Wesleyan UniversityU.S. Military AcademyIllinois Wesleyan UniversityUniversity of CincinnatiSouthern Methodist UniversityCalifornia State University, StanislausAgenția Națională pentru Cercetare și DezvoltareCalifornia State University, FresnoHamline UniversityMylanTexas State UniversityStrongUniversity of California, DavisSt. Olaf CollegeUniversity of MissouriMarquette UniversityGustavus Adolphus CollegeUniversity of OregonGrove City CollegeNorthern Michigan UniversityRocky Mountain Elk FoundationAzusa Pacific UniversityShandong UniversityKent State UniversityWashington and Lee UniversityUniversity of Northern IowaPitzer CollegeSan Francisco State UniversityMichigan Technological UniversityUniversity of DenverBrigham Young UniversityEmbry-Riddle Aeronautical UniversityReed CollegeSanta Clara UniversityWest Virginia UniversitySt. Francis Xavier UniversityUniversity of PittsburghIowa State UniversityMichigan State UniversityColgate UniversityNorthwestern UniversityMacalester CollegeTunghai UniversityOregon State UniversitySeoul National UniversityUniversity of South CarolinaMcGill UniversityCalifornia State University, SacramentoBall State UniversitySt. John's UniversityUniversity of Notre DamePfizer PharmaceuticalsCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityUniversity of WyomingMemorial University of NewfoundlandLake Forest CollegeNihon UniversityMississippi State UniversityUniversidad de GranadaEastern Washington UniversityLindenwood UniversityNeag School of EducationArizona State UniversityNorthern Illinois UniversityWestern Michigan UniversityVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityCreighton UniversityCentral Washington UniversityUniversity of ConnecticutFlorida State UniversityColorado State UniversityUniversity of MontanaDivision of Mathematical SciencesBoise State UniversityHarvard UniversityEli Lilly and CompanySan José State UniversityValparaiso UniversityTexas Tech UniversitySyracuse UniversityGeorge Washington UniversityArcadia FundWestern Washington UniversityUniversity of MinnesotaOklahoma State UniversityGeological Society of AmericaMcKnight FoundationPfizerUniversity of WashingtonOhio State UniversityIronwood Pharmaceuticals, IncorporatedEast Carolina UniversityMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyUniversity of ChicagoNorthern Arizona UniversityMinistry of Education, IndiaRutgers, The State University of New JerseyIdaho State UniversityUtah State UniversityYork UniversityConcordia University of EdmontonUniversity of DaytonFurman UniversityPurdue UniversityMontana State UniversityDartmouth CollegeWashington State UniversityBoston CollegeBoettcher FoundationInstitute of Management AccountantsUniversity of Nevada, RenoYale University
Keywordsnot available
DOInot available
Abstract
Commencement program from the University of Montana.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.779
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.233 | 0.071 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".
Quick stats
Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes