Vínculo mãe-filho, ambiente e desenvolvimento motor de crianças acompanhadas em ambulatório de seguimento de risco
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Identifying the factors resulting from the correlation between mother-child bond, environment and motor development (MD) in children overseen by risk follow-up in a public maternity hospital in Fortaleza. Methodology: An observational, cross-sectional and quantitative study was carried out, with a sample of 130 mothers/guardians and their 3- to 12-month-old infants who were being overseen by the risk follow-up clinic in Assis Chateaubriand maternity school. Data were collected through a form designed by the researcher, which contained socioeconomic data, as well as information concerning the routine of mothers and babies in hospital and at home, along with three other instruments: Mother-Child Bonding Evaluation Protocol, Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development – Infant Scale, and Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). Results: Data showed that the population was made up of 74.5% premature babies, 64.6% babies who spent over a month in the neonatal intensive care unit, and 86.2% low income families. Accordingly, the Affordances results were unfavorable to child development, with 93.8% considered inadequate. Concerning the home’s physical environment, 86.1% were considered insufficient to provide the children with challenges; with respect to the use of toys, 97% had no resources to stimulate gross motor skills, and 89.2% didn’t have fine-motor toys. None of the children attended daycares before the research. Mothers’ education was also perceived as a risk fator to child development: only 43.1% of mothers had graduated high school. Despite those factors, 62.3% of children had typical MD. Concerning the mother-child bond, 60% of mothers showed a strong bond with their children. In the interaction between variables, it was observed that the correlation between bonding and MD showed statistical significance (p˂0.05), indicating that a strong mother-child bond predisposed babies to adequate MD. Other correlations between variables such as environment and MD were analyzed but did not have statistical significance. Conclusions: Despite the presence of risk factors (biological, socioeconomic and environmental), this fact didn’t hinder the prevalence of typical MD in the assessed babies. It was also possible to link mother-child bonding and motor skills, suggesting that mothers who have a strong bond with their children benefit the latter’s motor development, overcoming environmental and biological adversities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".