Об одном иконографическом варианте образа грифона в греко-скифской торевтике
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L. Babenko. About the Interpretation of an Image of the Greco-Scythian Art \nAmong the burial inventory of the at least 5 complexes (Osnyagy, Pereshepyne, Olefirshuna, Pisochyn, Bogdanivka) there have been found golden stamped pendants diverse in their quantity (from 1 to 19) which had an image of a creature with peculiar features. The researchers interpret this image as that of a hare, a predator, a feline predator, a hoofed animal, a steppe marmot, a griffin. The analysis of the character’s iconography and the assumption of the possibility of separate variations through the peculiarity of the technological manufacture give ground for interpreting this creature as a griffin. \nThe local nature of the pendants areal distribution allows to assume that the probable places of their manufacture were the jewellery workshops of the Bils’ke settlement. \nThe origin of all the pendants from the complexes of the end of the 5th — the first quarter of the 4th centuries B. C. indicate a narrow chronological period of their use. This also allows involving this stamp of lamellate appliqué for secure chronological indicator in future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".