Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mandibular first molar and primary molars usually have two roots, on the mesial and distal sides.\nOccasionally, these molars have an extra root located in the distolingual aspect. Prevalence of the 3-rooted\nfirst permanent molar shows ethnic variation, ranging from about 3% in Caucasian to about 20% in\nMongoloid group, which includes Chinese, Japanese, Eskimo, American and Canadian Indians. The frequency\nof the mandibular molar with three roots decreases in the order of the first permanent molar, the\nsecond primary molar, and the first primary molar.\nIf the mandibular first or second primary molar has an additional distolingual root, the adjacent molars,\nincluding the first permanent molar, posterior to it also may have it. Coronal morphologic change\ncan occur in the mandibular first primary molars with three roots: the crown had more triangular-shape\ncompared to the one with two roots, possibly affected by the presence of additional distolingual root.\nClinically, exact diagnosis and treatment should be taken with those teeth for pulp canal treatment,\nextraction, and SS Cr
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it