ADAonline web site (2004 ongoing)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
My Contribution: Originator of print and online versions, sole researcher and writer (although with occasional contributions from five continents.) Provides an ongoing commentary and chapter-by-chapter critical essays on Nabokov's most complex novel, hyperlinked to and from annotations, images, and motif index. Over 900 pages and 800 images to date; 90,000 words written for new chapters from 2006-11. 120,000 hits. Expands on print version, appearing since 1993 (Professor Stephen Parker, U of Kansas: "a good number of the "Nabokovian" subscribers are there largely to get your on-going ADA annotations"). Acclaimed around world for content ("Boyd's magnificent ADAOnline" (anonymous reviewer for Canadian SSHRC grant application), "a masterpiece in itself" (Adrianna Kepinska), by other translators and annotators, and as example for literature on internet (Claudio Soares, 8 Aug 2009: "Just as ADA Online... inspired the "Blog of Machado de Assis" [in Brazil], now it also inspires other projects in Portugal"; "contains everything one needs to unriddle the novel... an engaging example of how things could be done on the Internet" (Olga Voronina, Bard College).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.131 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".