MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7054711541

Better Opportunities for All : Vietnam Poverty and Shared Prosperity Update

2020· report· en· W7054711541 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe World Bank Open Knowledge Repository (World Bank) · 2020
Typereport
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Frequency and Time Standards
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProsperityPovertyRural areaAgricultureScope (computer science)WageQuarter (Canadian coin)ProductivityRural poverty
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A massive reorganization of the rural
\n labor market is underway, with workers leaving agriculture
\n in large numbers. The agriculture sector has been
\n consistently losing an average of 4 percent of its workforce
\n annually since 2013. Most of those leaving agriculture have
\n remained in rural areas and been absorbed into
\n non-agriculture sectors, which have been creating rural
\n nonagricultural jobs at a rapid pace. Nearly 4 million
\n off-farm jobs have been created in rural areas since 2013,
\n mostly in the industry sector, led by manufacturing. There
\n are now almost as many non-agricultural jobs as agricultural
\n jobs in rural areas. The share of people in wage employment
\n in rural areas has risen dramatically, reaching 38 percent
\n in the first quarter of 2018, compared with just 28 percent
\n in 2013. Unlike densely populated areas, growth of
\n non-agriculture sectors in more distant, low-density areas
\n is normally based on absolute advantage, driven by external
\n demand, and delivered mostly by small and medium enterprises
\n (SMEs) due to the limited scope for achieving scale.
\n Strategies to expand economic opportunities in these areas
\n should aim to: (i) create a secondary economy supporting
\n industries based on the regional absolute advantages; (ii)
\n integrate these areas into the network economy to expand
\n their market potential; and (iii) reduce the cost of
\n migration to increase long-distance migration domestically.
\n This report is therefore focused on identifying the
\n challenges preventing, and ways to enhance, the poor’s
\n participation in more productive income-generating
\n opportunities. The analysis focuses exclusively on rural
\n areas, where 95 percent of the current poor reside. It is
\n presented in four sections. The first section presents the
\n evolution of rural incomes in Vietnam since 2010, showing
\n how non-agricultural incomes have grown in importance and
\n broadly transformed rural livelihoods. The second section
\n then explores the role of household and farm-specific
\n attributes, alongside local economies, in facilitating
\n non-agricultural employment, to identify the most critical
\n factors holding back the poor from being integrated into
\n off-farm activities. The third section turns to
\n opportunities in agriculture. This focuses on identifying
\n challenges and policy remedies for optimizing crop and
\n land-use choices among lagging groups to maximize their
\n agricultural incomes. The report concludes with a section on
\n policy implications, building on the presented analysis to
\n suggest policy options that provide a pathway for the
\n economic integration of the poor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it