MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7054746196

Between Speech and Music: Composing for Guitar with Dialectal Patterns

2019· dissertation· en· W7054746196 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Design and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuitarContext (archaeology)MusicalVariety (cybernetics)Meaning (existential)nobodyMusical instrument
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Music and speech share many of the same fundamental properties, with music often being referred to as a "universal language".The 20 th century saw many composers using speech as a musical element, at times combining it with acoustic instruments and exploiting the sonic similarities.Given the wide variety of timbres and techniques available on both the classical and electric guitar, it has proven to be an effective vehicle to imitate and blend with the human voice in speech-inspired compositions.This project examines the methods with which composers applied these concepts to contemporary guitar music, as well as the potential they yield to invoke a sense of place, nostalgia, and meaning in the audience.The core applications of this research involved a collaborative research-creation project with composer, Jason Noble, in which we created three new speech-based works involving guitar and electronics.In 2015, we decided to tour our home province of Newfoundland to record interviews with residents, and then to use those recordings as source material for musical creation.The dialects of Newfoundland and Labrador are diverse yet diminishing; and so we sought to celebrate them in an artistic context through this project.This paper discusses the creative and technological processes behind Noble's works One Foot in the Past (2016), Take Me Back (2017), and We Never Told Nobody (2019), which collectively celebrate the dialects of Newfoundland and Labrador while simultaneously contributing to the fields of guitar technique, notation, and composition.Research Ethics Board II: Certificate of Ethical Acceptability of Research Involving Humans REB File #: 73-0715 Abrégé La musique et la parole partagent plusieurs caractéristiques fondamentales, il n'est donc pas surprenant que la musique soit souvent décrite comme une langue universelle.Le vingtième siècle a vu plusieurs compositeurs intégrer la parole comme un élément musical en la combinant parfois avec des instruments acoustiques pour exploiter les similarités sonores.Tant la guitare classique que la guitare électrique, considérant la grande variété de timbres et techniques disponibles, ont prouvé être un véhicule efficace pour imiter et s'harmoniser avec la voix humaine dans des compositions inspirées de la parole.Ce projet étudie les manières utilisées par les compositeurs pour appliquer ces concepts à la guitare contemporaine, ainsi que sa capacité à inspirer un sens du lieu, de la nostalgie et de signification pour l'audience.Les principales applications de cette recherche ont impliqué un projet collaboratif de recherche-creation avec le compositeur Jason Noble, dans lequel nous avons créé trois nouvelles pièces basées sur la parole pour la guitare et l'électronique.En 2015, nous avons pris la décision de faire la tournée de notre province d'origine, Terre-Neuve, pour enregistrer des entrevues avec des résidents, pour ensuite utiliser ces enregistrements comme matériel de base pour la création musicale.Les dialectes de Terre-Neuve et Labrador sont multiples, mais en déclin, et nous avons donc cherché à les célébrer à travers une démarche artistique dans le cadre de ce projet.Ce papier illustre le processus créatif et technologique derrière les créations de Noble One Foot in the Past (2016), Take Me Back (2017), et We Never Told Nobody (2019), qui célèbrent collectivement les dialectes de Terre-Neuve et Labrador tout en contribuant simultanément au domaine de la technique de guitare, de la notation et de la composition.I would first like to extend gratitude to my dear friend and collaborator, Jason Noble, for the commitment to work alongside me throughout this entire project and for helping it to surpass all expectations.I am

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicLaser Design and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207