Atena Homérica : um estudo sobre a caracterização da deusa na Ilíada e na Odisseia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dissertation aims to build a portrait of the goddess Athena from Homeric poems.The work was divided into chapters that sought to add passages from the Iliad and Odyssey around specific themes.In addition, we tried to present the position of several scholars on the topic, so that the analysis of the excerpts would gain strength.The study began by treating Athena's birth.In this case, other texts from the Greek archaic period were used, given that this theme is not widely explored by Homer.We also used references presented by Hesiod, Homeric Hymns and Pindar.Then, several epithets and atributes of the goddess were studied.Regarding the epithets we restricted ourselves to the ones used by Homer; as for the atributes we moved a little towards tradition, especially the recurring ones in Classical Athens.After that, we dealt with the goddess epiphanies and the various ways she usually showed herself to mortals.Her warrior aspect and her partnership with the heroes in the battle were discussed next.To contrast with this element of strength, we explored, then, her mental aspect and the metis.We also presented several situations in which the goddess poluboulos, of many councils, appears helping and encouraging her protegs.Nuances of the metis involving manual skills of which Athena is considered to be protective were also analyzed.Finally, we explored the theme of menis (the wrath of gods, which also covers punishment inflicted) and specifically the wrath of Athena, which prevented the return of many greek heroes after the end of the Trojan War.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".