MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7054890787

BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE U HRVATSKOM GOSPODARSTVU – REZULTATI ISTRAŽIVANJA 2017.

2018· article· hr· W7054890787 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2018
Typearticle
Languagehr
FieldEngineering
TopicMagneto-Optical Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Business intelligenceBusiness managementResource (disambiguation)Human resource management
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Business intelligence (BI) or the system for collecting data from the business environment, and a basis for business decision making, is a management resource whose advantages have long been well-known to the economies of developed countries. Th e fi rst comprehensive study on the application of BI within companies that operate in Croatia was conducted in 2010/2011 and showed that only 19% of companies systematically conducted BI system activities. Th e repeated research conducted in the fi rst half of 2017 did not show any signifi cant changes. Still less than a quarter (24%) of the companies from the list of 1000 largest apply BI systematically. Responsiveness in the research as well as plans related to the BI system indicate that the general climate among the surveyed companies is not positive. Th is paper explains several possible reasons for such results, one of which is the so-called crisis in the largest Croatian company – Agrokor. Th e media coverage of this crisis started at the same time as the research on the implementation of BI in the 1000 largest companies. // Business intelligence (BI) ili sustav za prikupljanje podataka iz poslovne okoline na temelju kojih se donose poslovne odluke menadžerski je resurs čije su prednosti gospodarstva razvijenih zemalja davno upoznala. Prvo sveobuhvatno istraživanje o primjeni BI u tvrtkama koje posluju u Republici Hrvatskoj, provedeno 2010./2011., pokazalo je da tek 19% kompanija sustavno provode aktivnosti BI sustava. Ponovljeno istraživanje provedeno u prvoj polovici 2017. nije ukazalo na značajne promjene. I dalje manje od četvrtine (24%) tvrtki koje spadaju u red 1000 najvećih primjenjuju BI sustavno. Responzivnost u istraživanju kao i planovi vezani za BI sustav ukazuju da opća klima među ispitivanim tvrtkama nije odveć pozitivna, što se u radu objašnjava s nekoliko mogućih razloga od kojih je jedan tzv. kriza u najvećoj hrvatskoj kompaniji Agrokor, koja je (medijski) započela istodobno kada i istraživanje o primjeni BI-a u 1000 najvećih tvrtki.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsSame topicMagneto-Optical Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207