MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7054907745

Assessing the Clinical Relevance of BRCA1 BRCT Domain Variants of Uncertain Significance

2024· dissertation· en· W7054907745 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMagneto-Optical Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn silicoClassifier (UML)Clinical significanceMissense mutationOvarian cancerGermlineGenetic testing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Breast and ovarian cancer are among the most common cancers in Canadian women. Approximately 5-10% of breast and 20-25% of ovarian cancers are inherited, with pathogenic germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants causing the majority of hereditary cases. While genetic testing is used to identify pathogenic BRCA variant carriers who would subsequently benefit from personalized screening, prophylactic and treatment steps, its widespread use has resulted in the discovery of thousands of variants of uncertain significance (VUS). VUSs pose a critical clinical challenge as they are unable to be effectively interpreted, limiting clinicians’ ability to accurately assess cancer risk and recommend appropriate management steps. We sought to build a computational classifier specific to BRCA1’s BRCT domain to accurately predict missense VUS pathogenicity and stratify VUSs to prioritize for functional analyses like phosphopeptide binding assays. All BRCA1 BRCT missense variants were collected from the ClinVar database and were analyzed using 50 different in silico tools. Molecular Feature Selection Tool (MFeaST) ranked tools based on their ability to discriminate pathogenic and benign variants. Supervised classifiers were then trained using combinations of the most discriminative in silico tools, with the most accurate classifier being used to score all VUSs. Phosphopeptide binding assays were conducted on select suspected pathogenic and benign VUSs to assess their impact on binding activity and folding. Our results show that an Ensemble Subspace kNN classifier trained with 9 in silico tools (CADD hg19, MetaRNN, ClinPred, VEST4, BayesDel AF, EVE, Eigen PC, gMVP and PolyPhen2) demonstrated the best performance out of all trained supervised models, with 91.1% and 87.9% accuracy on the training and validation sets, respectively. Compared to individual in silico and AI protein language models, our model demonstrated the highest accuracy on the training set and comparable accuracy on the validation set of BRCA1 BRCT variants. Results from the phosphopeptide binding assays show that suspected pathogenic VUSs demonstrated either reduced BRCT binding ability, reduced BRCT protein levels, or a combination of both. Suspected benign VUSs demonstrated retained BRCT binding ability and BRCT protein levels. The computational and functional evidence obtained through this study will contribute to the reclassification of BRCT VUSs to pathogenic or benign, strengthening and broadening variant classification databases essential for clinicians to make decisive management recommendations for BRCA1 variant carriers. Additionally, this study highlights the potential of domain-specific computational approaches for characterizing missense variants in other multi-domain cancer susceptibility genes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicMagneto-Optical Properties and Applications→French-language works237,207→