MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7054914003

Arts and Crafts Architecture: Local Visionaries & Modern Interpretations

2016· dissertation· en· W7054914003 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOtago University Research Archive (University of Otago) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Design and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)The artsHandicraftArchitecturePopulationCultural heritagePlacemakingStyle (visual arts)Real estate
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heritage buildings are important assets to cities. More than just their physical presence they embody values of the society, economy and the time which they are from. The Arts and Crafts movement was an international movement originating in Britain in the mid nineteenth century. It manifested in many forms, including the architecture of the period. The movement had among other foci a desire to produce beautiful objects and expressed discontent at the industrial progress of modern civilisation.\n\nInfill development can pose risks to heritage values by being unsympathetic to context and buildings around. This research analyses and assesses the effects on the values of heritage buildings caused by infill development and design styles. The main explorative area is the replication of historical architectural styles. The Arts and Crafts movement and its architectural style are used as a framework of values upon which the research is based. This is done using two case studies: Laneway houses in Vancouver, Canada and infill development in Dunedin, New Zealand. Lessons from the Vancouver study are used to develop factors to be included in design guidelines for Dunedin’s heritage areas. While quite different in terms of spatial size, rates of change, economic development and population growth, the heritage challenges experienced in both study locations are similar. The research uses a critical realist approach to understand these differences.\n\nThis research has affirmed that replication of architectural styles cannot simply be labelled ‘good’ or ‘bad’ in terms of heritage values. Context and factors such as the real estate market and community preference are also important in determining appropriateness. Regardless of style, unsympathetic architecture risks degrading heritage values. As a result of this research, it is recommended that a site by site assessment is needed to determine what factors and design features should be taken into account in new infill design. This research has also contributed to an understanding of how Arts and Crafts values are reflected within built form and planning today. The research shows these values are to an extent reflected within laneway houses in Vancouver through their design and development process as well as in the ethos of the developers who built them.\n\nIt is argued that modern technologies such as the Passivhaus movement, energy efficiency and the production system of prefabrication are in essence ‘new’ Arts and Crafts values. Managing the effects of infill development, and managing change will lead to much more beneficial outcomes for both heritage values and the streetscape. It is suggested the overarching goal of any new insertion should be to enable the best (contemporary) notions of liveability possible, while not detracting from the potency and validity of heritage examples representative of their time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.804
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOtago University Research Archive (University of Otago)Same topicLaser Design and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207