MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7055101477

Automatización de la separación desmonte - mineral Ore Sorter en Mina Papagayo

2018· dissertation· en· W7055101477 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuerenati · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Design and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMineral processingIron oreMining industryGermanQuality (philosophy)Head (geology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compañía Minera Poderosa SA (CMPSA) at its center of operations in the area Pataz, Libertad department currently is operating in the mining of different mining operations, for processing in the Marañón Plant and Plant Santa Maria, using a transport system dump mine plant with capacity of 24 MT.
\n\tThe company has a defined operation based on all the years that it is performing its duties, but following its policy of continuous improvement, has been proposed to increase the efficiency of Mina, for which want to reduce dilution in the exploitation phase separating material has no values, in order to increase the head grade of the ore to be transported to the processing plant.
\n\tTo this end, it is intended that an automatic machine with German technology called Ore Sorter to operate meeting the requirements of capacity and quality in the area of the mine to reach more than 65 MT / hour mineral in the diet treatment.
\n\tTo fulfill this purpose has contacted the German company Commodas UltraSort who manufacture equipment to treat different types of materials. Currently are working in different countries with mining operations marked success. Reference must be Brazil, Canada, Russia, Australia, USA and Austria among others are working with iron ore, gold, non-metallic and polymetallic. Based on the available information has been made a follow-up, coordination and selection of equipment which might be used in operations CMPSA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.396
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuerenatiSame topicLaser Design and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207