Coopera????o internacional para o desenvolvimento: um estudo de caso da coopera????o t??cnica Brasil - Canad?? no setor p??blico (2003-2007)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este trabalho tem como objetivo apresentar o surgimento da Coopera????o \nInternacional para o Desenvolvimento, bem como os principais atores, focalizando \numa de suas modalidades: a Coopera????o T??cnica Internacional. Para isso, ?? feito \num estudo de caso do Projeto de Coopera????o T??cnica firmado entre a Escola \nNacional de Administra????o P??blica (ENAP) e a Canada School of Public Service \n(CSPS) na ??rea de fortalecimento institucional no setor p??blico brasileiro. \nPrimeiramente, ?? apresentada a evolu????o hist??rica do Sistema Internacional de \nCoopera????o ao Desenvolvimento, bem como sua fundamenta????o te??rica nos \nenfoques realista e liberal. A Coopera????o T??cnica Internacional ?? debatida \nposteriormente, tendo em conta sua institucionaliza????o no Brasil. Por meio do \nestudo de caso da coopera????o entre a ENAP e a CSPS, focada na capacita????o de \nservidores p??blicos brasileiros, pode-se concluir que a coopera????o t??cnica \ninternacional agrega valor ??s miss??es das institui????es cooperantes, possibilitando a \nrealiza????o de a????es nas escolas do servi??o p??blico brasileira e canadense, \nbaseadas no compartilhamento de conhecimentos de ponta em gest??o p??blica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.481 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".