The 2000 Canadian Peregrine Falcon Survey
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTR•CT.--Nationalsurveys for Peregrine Falcons (Falco peregrinus) have been conducted in Canada every five years since 1970.This paper discusses the results of the seventh such survey.In 2000, 22 areas in nine provinces and three territories were searched for three peregrine subspecies.Within the continental E p. anatum range, 374 sites were occupied by territorial peregrines.As in previous surveys, the majority of anatum sites were located in the western boreal ecoregion.However, numbers are increasing in populations south of 58øN.The number of E p. tundrius in 2000 was similar to previous surveys at Rankin Inlet, Nunavut and Tuktut Nogait National Park, Northwest Territories.Nine sites occupied on the North Slope of the Yukon Territory is a slight increase in this tundrius subgroup.Coastal E p. pealei, on the Queen Charlotte Islands appear to have been stable for at least the past two decades.Pealei numbers on the north shore of Vancouver Island and the surrounding area were substantially higher in 2000--largely the result of a more extensive search effort.Reproductive output in 2000 was 1.0 or more young/territorial pair, except in the anatum subpopulations of northern Alberta and the Peel River, Yukon Territory where it was 0.7 and 0.6 young/territorial pair, respectively.Overall, with stable populations in the north and growing populations in the south, the peregrine recovery is well underway and in some areas, approaching historical size and probably ecological carrying capacity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".