MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7055294788

Childhood Maltreatment and the Association with Life Dissatisfaction

2021· dissertation· en· W7055294788 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsKingston Health Sciences CentreQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLogistic regressionAssociation (psychology)Poison controlBivariate analysisMental healthInjury preventionSuicide preventionOccupational safety and healthChild abuse
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examined the association between childhood maltreatment (witnessing violence in the household, and experiences of physical and emotional abuse by an adult prior to the age of 16,) and dissatisfaction with later life. Experiences in childhood have been shown to have influences on the developing child (both on the brain and body), with adverse experiences associated with increased risks for negative life outcomes (such as mental and physical illnesses). Dissatisfaction with life has also been shown to lead to negative health outcomes; therefore, the goal of this research was to determine if childhood maltreatment could predict life satisfaction/dissatisfaction. As a secondary analysis, this study used data from more than twenty-five thousand individuals aged 15 and over who participated in the Canadian Community Health Survey-Mental Health (2012). The data were analyzed using bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions. Two regression models were developed. Model 1 utilized a cumulative count variable representing ‘Number of Types of Childhood Maltreatment Experienced’ as the exposure variable, and model 2 utilized a binary exposure variable representing ‘Ever Abused’ as the exposure variable. Life dissatisfaction was measured using the survey item, “Using a scale of 0 to 10 where 0 means ‘Very dissatisfied’ and 10 means ‘Very satisfied’, how do you feel about your life as a whole right now?”, where scores of 0 to 4 represented dissatisfaction. Compared to individuals who did not experience maltreatment in childhood, experiencing four types was significantly associated with more than twice the odds of dissatisfaction with life (AOR= 2.356; CI 1.595- 3.481), and experiencing any maltreatment in childhood increased ones odds of later life dissatisfaction by 40% (AOR= 1.424; CI 1.119- 1.813). Both models controlled for: total household income, self-perceived physical health, self-perceived mental health, and measures of emotional and social support (has people to depend on, and has close relationships). The following variables were adjusted for, but determined statistically insignificant: age, importance of religion, family mental health, and education. The findings from this study suggest childhood maltreatment predicts life satisfaction in later life, prompting further research into preventing and mitigating the effects of child maltreatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→