MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7055328244

Conference At Osgoode Professional Development Examines Climate Change Liability Risk – For Directors

2017· article· en· W7055328244 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicThermal properties of materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiabilityClimate changeSustainabilityAsset (computer security)CommonwealthFeelingGlobal warmingCorporation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TORONTO, October 16, 2017 – There are close to 700 climate change cases in the courts in the U.S. and Canada today – and companies are feeling the heat.\nIn recent months, Kinder Morgan Canada’s public offering of securities was challenged for using overly optimistic projections for the future demand for oil. Global “oil majors,” including two Canadian companies, have been sued in California for their contributions to sea-level rise. And oil and gas companies have been sued for overstating the value of their reserves, in view of the Paris agreement.\nWhat are the obligations of officers and directors in Canada in light of climate change? What liability risks do companies face? What information must informed investors have? And what are leading Canadian companies doing to transition to a low-carbon economy?\nThese are some of the questions that will be examined at the Climate Change: Directors at Risk conference taking place on Friday, October 20, 2017 from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. EDT (In Person or Webcast) at Osgoode Professional Development Centre, 1 Dundas St. W., 26th Floor, in Toronto. Speakers include partners at leading Toronto law firms Osler Hoskin & Harcourt; Gowlings; Torys; RBC Global Asset Management; the Ontario Securities Commission; and CPA Canada, Greenpeace, the Canadian Coalition for Good Governance, and Canada’s Ecofiscal Commission.\nThe conference is organized by the Commonwealth Climate and Law Initiative (CCLI) and supported by the Ivey Foundation. CCLI is a project with researchers at the Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment at Oxford University, the Prince’s Accounting for Sustainability Initiative, the Allard School of Law at UBC, and the Environmental Justice and Sustainability Clinic at Osgoode. CCLI studies corporate law obligations of boards of directors to develop transition strategies towards a low-carbon economy.\n“Canadian companies are particularly vulnerable to liability risks from overstating assets such as oil and gas in the ground, which can create legal problems for the company and its officers and directors,” said Professor Cynthia Williams, Osler Chair in Business Law and Co-Director of the Jay and Barbara Hennick Centre for Business and Law at Osgoode as well as founding CCLI team member. “Litigation is exploding as a strategy to persuade companies to take seriously the need to transition to a low-carbon economy. Well-advised boards need to take action now, or face the serious legal consequences of inaction.”\nFor more information and to register for the conference, please visit here.\n-30-\nOsgoode Hall Law School of York University has a proud history of 128 years of leadership and innovation in legal education and legal scholarship. A total of about 900 students are enrolled in Osgoode’s three-year Juris Doctor (JD) Program as well as joint and combined programs. The school’s Graduate Program in Law is also the largest in the country and one of the most highly regarded in North America. In addition, Osgoode Professional Development, which operates out of Osgoode’s facility in downtown Toronto, offers both degree and non-degree programming for Canadian and international lawyers, non-law professionals, firms and organizations. Osgoode has an internationally renowned faculty of 60 full-time professors, and more than 100 adjunct professors. Our respected community of more than 18,000 alumni are leaders in the legal profession and in many other fields in Canada and across the globe.\nYork University is known for championing new ways of thinking that drive teaching and research excellence. Our students receive the education they need to create big ideas that make an impact on the world. Meaningful and sometimes unexpected careers result from cross-discipline programming, innovative course design and diverse experiential learning opportunities. York students and graduates push limits, achieve goals and find solutions to the world’s most pressing social challenges, empowered by a strong community that opens minds. York U is an internationally recognized research university – our 11 faculties and 26 research centres have partnerships with 200+ leading universities worldwide. Located in Toronto, York is the third largest university in Canada, with a strong community of 53,000 students, 7,000 faculty and administrative staff, and more than 295,000 alumni. York U’s fully bilingual Glendon campus is home to Southern Ontario’s Centre of Excellence for French Language and Bilingual Postsecondary Education.\nMedia Contacts:\nVirginia Corner, Communications Manager, Osgoode Hall Law School of York University, 416-736-5820, vcorner@osgoode.yorku.ca\nSandra McLean, York University Media Relations, 416-736-2100 ext. 22097, sandramc@yorku.ca

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicThermal properties of materialsFrench-language works237,207