MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7055701617

Defining, Refining, and Enacting Religious Reflexivities in Pakistani-Canadian Muslim Families

2019· dissertation· W7055701617 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2019
Typedissertation
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrientalismReflexivityRacializationIdentity (music)IntersectionalityIslamPoliticsNarrativeEthnic group
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Political and popular discourse maintain Orientalist myths about Muslims as uniformly and fatalistically driven by a monolithic Islam, fueling a clash of civilizations. While researchers disrupt this Orientalist narrative by underscoring the presence of Muslim “reflexivity,” or the critical engagement with religious identities, beliefs, and practices, they nevertheless unintentionally reify a uniform Muslim reflexivity. This dissertation is the first empirically based study that demonstrates the social patterns of multiple forms of Muslim reflexivities. I highlight two patterns of reflexivities that relate to different approaches to religion: orthodox and heterodox. I further refine these patterns by highlighting how group and individual statuses shape social location, and thus subjectivity. I draw on theories of racialization and gender and I utilize a sample of 56 currently and previously married Pakistani Canadian Muslims to parse differences between orthodox and heterodox reflexivities and explore how divergent approaches to religion coincide with contrary patterns. These patterns are complicated by group identity for minorities within minorities (e.g., Shias) and by individual statuses (e.g., previously married women). In order to understand these divergent patterns, I extend the concept of Muslim reflexivity by incorporating a religious approach. Orthodox reflexive Muslim participants, who view one approach as correct, are preoccupied with authority given their identification with a marginalized minority group. Thus, they perceive ethnic boundaries as bright and gender boundaries as rigid. The focus of their reflexivity is dawat, or teaching others about the “true” Islam. This contrasts with heterodox reflexive Muslim participants, who view multiple approaches as correct. They do not perceive their minority group as being threatened, and thus do not seek out authority to legitimize their identity. In turn, they perceive ethnic boundaries as blurred, and maintain gender fluid attitudes and practices. The focus of their reflexivity is akhlaq, or having polite manners and ensuring mutually satisfying intimate relations. I conclude by discussing theoretical contributions and policy implications, cautioning against conflating categories of practice and analysis, and also problematizing liberal feminist approaches that pathologize Islam in efforts to ‘liberate Muslim women.’

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0230.012
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→