MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7055874192

The effects of the SCCmec element and colony spreading on the virulence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a nematode model

2013· dissertation· en· W7055874192 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSCCmecStaphylococcus aureusVirulenceMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcal infectionsMeticillinMicrococcaceaePathogen
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus presents clinical challenges. The ability of S. aureus to cause human disease is correlated with the nematocidal activity of that isolate. This thesis investigates the relationship between SCCmec type, colony spreading, and the presence of the fudoh/psm-mec region of MRSA isolates to their ability to kill Caenorhabditis elegans. PCR was used to test for the fudoh/psm-mec region in 420 CMRSA2 isolates and 155 CMRSA1 isolates. Spread plate assays were performed on 149 CMRSA2 isolates to determine correlation between SCCmec type and colony spreading. Fudoh/psm-mec was correlated with the infection/colonization status of a patient. SCCmec type IV was correlated with increased spreading ability. SCCmec type, PFGE type, spa type, and colony spreading ability of 40 MRSA isolates were determined; these isolates were characterized using a nematode killing assay. It was found that the colony spreading ability of an isolate correlated with the nematocidal ability of that isolate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→