MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7055898782

Design of a Semi-Automated Carousel Loading Device

2019· report· en· W7055898782 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2019
Typereport
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Work (physics)Plan (archaeology)Stress (linguistics)Set (abstract data type)Stress testing (software)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The following report outlines the design work performed for Vidir Vertical Storage Solutions, on behalf of the University of Manitoba, in developing a semi-automated loading device. This device is to assist Vidir’s customers in loading large, heavy rolled goods into carousels, in order to improve safety, efficiency, and ergonomics. The project definition, including needs, constraints, and limitations are outlined to provide the necessary context for the decisions that were made throughout the project. The preliminary concepts from which Vidir selected the basis of the final design, are also included herein. The final design consists of a carriage which travels along a set of guiding rails and is driven by a set of vertical and horizontal linear actuators. For analysis, the device is broken into its subcomponents. The functionality and design decisions pertaining to the base structure, the carriage, the carousel hooks, and the electrical systems are presented. Subsequently, a thorough stress analysis of each structure is outlined, including loading conditions, stress levels and factors of safety. In addition to the structural explanation and stress analysis, the operating procedure and controls logic for the device are laid out, and a detailed manufacturing plan is provided. A complete drawing package, including a bill of materials, is enclosed. Finally, a cost breakdown of the proposed device is included, with the material cost totalling CA$5,400. The future work to be performed during the next phase of the project, from January to April 2020, includes the manufacturing, construction, and testing of the loading device. Additionally, the PLC programming will be done concurrently with the physical testing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→