Duty and Dependency: The Life and Career of Edward James Jarvis, 1788-1852
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Edward Jarvis was a colonial judge during the late Georgian and early Victorian periods whose career encompassed more than one jurisdiction within the British Empire. Following several years of study at the Inns of Court in London, he secured positions as a judge in the colonies of New Brunswick and Malta before being appointed Chief Justice of Prince Edward Island in 1828, a position he held until his death in 1852. Throughout Jarvis’s life duty and dependency were constant themes. He was one of a group of second-generation Loyalists who began their careers in the colony of New Brunswick, and brought many of his generation’s beliefs regarding law and empire to his judicial roles, whether confronting piracy in Malta in the early 1820s or land protests in Prince Edward Island during the 1830s. In his rulings he sought to administer colonial law in a fair and impartial manner, thereby consolidating the property regime in the latter colony. His role as Chief Justice, however, meant that he was dependent upon the British Government for his livelihood, a situation that ultimately became untenable when the granting of responsible government led to a substantial cut in his salary in his final years. Both duty and dependency were part of Jarvis’s personal as well as professional life: as household patriarch he supported his family and other dependents, who in turn gave him emotional support, loyalty, and deference. The private world of family enabled him to function in the “public” sphere, but also brought bereavement and practical challenges. This study suggests that, while Jarvis did carry out his professional function of upholding British law, particularly property law in the face of a popular protest movement, it came at a cost, both financial and personal, not evident in the public record.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".