MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7055976429

Development of gel and fluorescence based assays to monitor DNA cleavage, binding, and inhibition by the human cytomegalovirus terminase UL89-C

2017· dissertation· en· W7055976429 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDNANucleaseConcatemerHuman cytomegalovirusProtein subunitRecombinant DNACleavage (geology)Single-stranded binding proteinOligonucleotide
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The terminase enzyme of the Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is responsible for the packaging and cleaving of concatameric viral DNA during viral replication. Due to its vital role in the viral life cycle, the terminase enzyme has the potential to become a strong candidate for anti-viral treatments. Furthermore, there is no mammalian equivalent; therefore, drugs targeted to terminase-like proteins should be safe and highly selective.In order to study and screen potential inhibitors to the terminase enzyme, we developed gel-based DNA cleavage assays with a resolution of a single nucleotide, which allowed us to detect the precise cleavage of DNA substrates via the C-terminal nuclease domain of the UL89 terminase subunit (UL89-C). We then utilized these assays to screen compound libraries provided by various collaborators. Furthermore, we then attempted to develop a DNA binding assay to characterize the DNA binding ability of UL89-C, and its T4 bacteriophage homolog gp17, using fluorescence anisotropy. Thus, our results have not only important implications with regards to drug discovery efforts, but also shed light on the mechanisms of DNA binding and cleavage, drug action, and potential drug resistance. Furthermore, due to the conserved nature of the terminase nuclease, these active site inhibitors may have broad-spectrum anti-herpetic properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207