MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7055977966

Éducation, privatisation, ségrégation : regards croisés Nord/Sud Education, privatisation, segregation: comparative North/South perspectives

2018· other· en· W7055977966 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForgePublic sectorESPACEGlobalization
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ArgumentaireL'opposition entre cole publique et cole prive n'est pas nouvelle, et le dbat sur la privatisation de la premire non plus (Vinokur, 2004).Ce processus est discut dans de nombreux contextes nationaux, dans un premier temps dans les pays du Nord , comme le rapporte l'OCDE (OCDE, 2015), mais apparat galement comme une tendance aujourd'hui globale, dveloppe progressivement dans les pays dits du Sud (Mc Pherson et al., 2014).Nanmoins, la dfinition de la privatisation de l'ducation ne fait pas l'unanimit, car le processus adopte des formes multiples et connat des variations selon les contextes nationaux, qui mnent des formes d'hybridation de l'ducation (Ball, 2009 ;Vinokur, 2004).Mondialisation oblige, la privatisation ne se limite plus un phnomne socialement marqu par l'litisme et la recherche d'un entre-soi ducatif.Elle dsigne dsormais un processus complexe aux dimensions multiples impactant aussi la gestion, l'organisation de la scolarit au sein des espaces nationaux et locaux, ainsi que la fourniture de tout un panel de services ducatifs et pri-ducatifs par une myriade d'acteurs (Walford, 2013).Cette privatisation passe la fois par celle de services scolaires publics, progressivement externaliss, mais galement par la monte d'un secteur priv de l'ducation et la diversification de l'offre ducative prive (tant dans le primaire, le secondaire que dans le suprieur).La globalisation des normes ducatives, et plus largement la nolibralisation de la gestion des institutions publiques, encouragent ce processus qui mne la cration de nouvelles formes d'coles et de nouvelles dynamiques sociales et spatiales lies la cration de marchs scolaires de plus en plus comptitifs (Flouzis, Maroy & Van Zanten, 2013).Objets de controverses et d'interprtations diverses (Laval & Dardot, 2009), la no-libralisation en tant qu'ensemble de politiques promouvant la primaut du march, la fluidit du capital et du travail et l'intrt individuel dans toutes les sphres de la vie conomique et politique (Lipman & Haines, 2007) s'attache, depuis le dbut des annes 2000, restructurer en profondeur les systmes ducatifs au titre de nouvelles politiques ducatives.Apparues de faon synchrone

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.483
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.006
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207