MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7056070419

Definição do período de retorno (Tr) para delimitação de áreas inundáveis: estudo da ação combinada da maré e do escoamento superficial

2015· dissertation· pt· W7056070419 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePortuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlooding (psychology)Hydrology (agriculture)PopulationSurface runoffFlood myth
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nas zonas com maior risco de inundação associada à proximidade do mar, em zona de elevada densidade populacional ocorre um aumento associado das probabilidades de perdas humanas, económicas e sociais. A delimitação de áreas inundáveis permite identificar as áreas em risco. Nos casos em que a fronteira de jusante está sujeita à oscilação do nível de maré nem sempre este fator é tido em conta. Apresenta-se o caso prático do estudo da Ribeira da Canada, que consistiu na simulação da ocorrência simultânea de escoamento superficial e altura das marés. Verificou-se que a delimitação das zonas inundáveis não poderá ter apenas em conta o escoamento superficial resultante das bacias hidrográficas. Os resultados da modelação mostram que a ação combinada da onda de maré e do escoamento superficial é condicionante até 490m da foz, devendo ser tida em consideração na determinação do período de retorno de inundações em zonas costeiras e estuarinas; Abstract: Definition of the return period (TR) for delimitation of flood areas-study of the combined action of the tide and runoff In areas with a high population density and greater risk of flooding due to proximity to the sea, the increase of human, economic and social losses is expected. By delimitating the areas liable to flood, the risk areas can be identified. The situation of the downstream boundary being affected by the fluctuation of the tide level is not always considered. This investigation presents the case study of the Ribeira da Canada, consisting of a simulation in which surface runoff and high tide occur simultaneously. The study clearly demonstrates that the delimitation of areas liable to flooding should not be based only on surface runoff from the drainage basins. The modelling results shows that the combined action of the tide wave and surface drainage can affect an area up to 490m from the river’s outlet and must be considered when determining the flood return period in the coastal and estuarine areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePortuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207