Eficacia de la intervención del ejercicio físico en el manejo de la fragilidad en el paciente adulto mayor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Systematize the evidences on the effectiveness of the exercise intervention in the management of frailty in the elderly patient.Material and Methods: Design a systematic, quantitative review.The population was given by 79 articles, the sample was 10 articles.The following databases were used: Pub Med, Cochrane, Wiley.100% quantitative type, study design 90% systematic reviews and experimental 10%.According to the quality of the evidence, it was found to be 100% high and according to the strong recommendation strength of 100%; depending on the country of origin, they correspond to Spain 30%, Canada 10%, Belgium 10%, Australia 20%, Europe 10%, Germany 10% and Italy 10%.Results: 70% (n = 7/10) shows the effectiveness of the physical exercise intervention in the management of frailty in the elderly patient.The other 30% (n = 3/10) indicate discrepancy in the effectiveness of the exercise intervention in the management of frailty in the elderly patient.Conclusion: It was concluded that 7 of 10 authors point out the coincidence between the effectiveness of the exercise intervention in the management of frailty in the elderly patient.The other 3 of 10 disagree on the effectiveness of the exercise intervention in the management of frailty in the elderly patient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".